A few weeks ago Melissa and I had a chance to see the increasingly popular Rob Bell, who serves as the pastor of Mars Hill Church in Grand Rapids Michigan and creator/star of the “Nooma” video study series and author of a number of books. For years I didn’t pay much attention to all the Rob Bell talk as I sort of wrote him off as a Joel Olsteen or other non-denominational rock stars who didn’t interest me. That was until I watched a Nooma video then began listening to his weekly podcast. What I discovered was a message that was new and fresh and not based on self help and the prosperity gospel. Actually, I found Bell’s messages to be fairly progressive, but not in your face. For example, Bell’s book and speaking tour is titled Drops Like Stars and is about his theology of suffering. He never really comes out and says bluntly that he does not believe God is a punishing and vengeful God that causes suffering as punishment and then backs up his statement with academic arguments. However, it is clear throughout his presentation his stories and creative illustrations focus on a God who suffers with us and calls us to work against suffering in world and to be a comforting presence to those who are suffering (process theology anyone?). Bell’s message is one that seems progressive but doesn’t make overt controversial statements, however, it is a style that seems to keep people listening and not shutting off when they hear something they don’t agree with. When some Christians in the media (John Piper, Pat Robertson) are proclaiming God’s wrath is found in tornados and earthquakes, Bell’s message is a refreshing and important one to hear.
I spent the entire next day at an event featuring retired Episcopal Bishop John Shelby Spong. Actually, I had the privilege and honor to give the introduction of Bishop Spong to 250 people. Now if you want a progressive Christian leader/author/speaker with an “in-your-face” message, Bishop Spong is your guy. Spong’s appeal is definitely to older generations (of the 250 there were probably four of us under the age of 45 at the event) and his speaking style is more academic lecture oriented.
It’s not unusual for Bishop Spong to draw protesters to his events over his progressive stances on gay and lesbian rights in the church and his challenging and re-visioning of church doctrine. We did not have any protestors for the event, however, some church members were upset that we were hosting the event at Tempe First United Methodist. A few folks claimed he was “not a Christian” and we should not have him speak at our church.
A lot of actually have a lot of “colorful” things to say about Bishop Spong (he has received a number of legitimate death threats). His critics beliefs about him, however, are often formed without reading anything he has ever written, expect maybe some of his controversial quotes that are used to prooftext criticisms of him. If you actually read any of his books though you would find that he is man of deep Christian faith that cares deeply about Jesus and the future of the Church.
Take the following quote, for example: Bishop Spong writes on page 229 of Jesus For the Non-Religious, “It is my conviction that the essence of the Christian gospel can be summed up in words attributed to Jesus in the Fourth Gospel: ‘I have come that they might have life and have it abundantly’ (10:10). If abundant life is the ultimate value to which Christianity is dedicated, as I believe it is, then we must judge all contemporary expressions of Christianity by the standard of their ability to enhance life and where there are failures we must seek to understand why.”
Overall, Spong is seeking to expose the injustices of the Christian tradition that have promoted racism, sexism, ethnocentrism, and homophobia and have caused countless numbers of people a great deal of pain and in many cases death throughout history. Bishop Spong argues for a church, inspired by Jesus Christ that transcends categories and attitudes that seek to hurt others in the name of tradition and orthodoxy.
Needless to say it was an interesting couple of days that featured two amazing speakers/theologians. Both have very different styles of how they get their messages across and their primary appeal is to two completely different age groups.
So I guess my biggest question is, what will be more effective in shaping the future of the church, especially around issues of inclusiveness and peace and justice: A message presented in a more subtle, creative and even beautiful way like that of Rob Bell that may take longer to take effect, but may have a wider appeal? Or will it be a bold and straight forward message like that of Bishop Spong that doesn’t mess around and demands change right here, right now?



